Does the ACLU do good and helpful work?

Link: => unalreho.nnmcloud.ru/d?s=YToyOntzOjc6InJlZmVyZXIiO3M6MzY6Imh0dHA6Ly9iYW5kY2FtcC5jb21fZG93bmxvYWRfcG9zdGVyLyI7czozOiJrZXkiO3M6MzY6IldoYXQgaXMgdGhlIGFjbHUgYW5kIHdoYXQgZG8gdGhleSBkbyI7fQ==


That would form the basis for follow-up meetings and follow-up policy advocacy. The Women's Rights Project dominated the legal field, handling more than twice as many cases as the , including breakthrough cases such as , , and. Collins, using the threat of habeas corpus suits managed to have the stockade closed down.

At least I learned some social skills from the recovering junkie who runs the local wellness center. It is a mission to them and other atheists to pervert the freedoms of others. That meant the organization was indeed ready right out of the gate.

What Does The ACLU Do? It's An Important Watchdog For The American People

Officiallythe organization has been supported and criticized by liberal and conservative organizations alike. Both organizations engage in civil rights litigation, advocacy, and education, but only donations to the 501 c 3 foundation are tax deductible, and only the 501 c 4 group can engage in unlimited political. The two organizations share office space and employees. Its focus was onprimarily for anti-war protesters. It defended several during the. The executive director manages the day-to-day operations of the organization. The board of directors consists of 80 persons, including representatives from each state affiliate, as well as at-large delegates. The organization has its headquarters ina 40-story skyscraper located in. In 1937, an internal debate erupted over whether to defend 's right to distribute anti-union literature. During the early 1950s andthe board was divided on whether to defend communists. In 1968, a schism formed over whether to represent 's anti-war activism. In 1973, there was internal conflict over whether to call for the impeachment of. Graph reflects an increase in donations following U. President Trump's January 2017 executive order barring millions of refugees and citizens of seven Muslim-majority countries. In some cases, the law permits plaintiffs who successfully sue government agencies to collect money damages or other monetary relief. In particular, the leaves the government liable in some civil rights cases. Fee awards under this civil rights statute are considered equitable relief rather than damages, and government entities are not immune from equitable relief. In 2006, the sought to prevent monetary judgments in the particular case of violations of church-state separation. Howard Simon, executive director of the Florida affiliate, joins in a protest of the with Most of the organization's workload is performed by its local affiliates. The affiliates operate autonomously from the national organization; each affiliate what is the aclu and what do they do its own staff, executive director, board of directors, and budget. Each affiliate consists of two non-profit corporations: a corporation that does not perform lobbying, and a corporation which is entitled to lobby. For example, in a twenty-month period beginning January 2004, the was involved in fifty-one cases according to their annual report—thirty-five cases in state courts, and sixteen in. They provided legal representation in thirty-three of those cases, and served as amicus in the remaining eighteen. They listed forty-four volunteer attorneys who assisted them in those cases. Our policy is that possessing even pornographic material about children should not itself be a crime. The way to deal with this issue is to prosecute the makers of child pornography for exploiting minors. However, a leaked memo from June 2018 said that speech that can inflict serious harms and impede progress toward equality may be a what is the aclu and what do they do priority for the organization. The national organization's position is based on the phrases a well regulated Militia and the security of a free State. It opposes the use of religious beliefs to discriminate, such as refusing to provide abortion coverage or providing services to people. It believes that single-sex education contributes to gender stereotyping and compares single-sex education to racial segregation. Conversely, it has been criticized by conservatives, such as when it argued against official prayer in public schools, or when it opposed the Patriot Act. But the defense of freedom of speech is most critical when the message is one most people find repulsive. Three decisions in 1919 each upheld convictions under laws against certain kinds of anti-war speech. In 1919, the Court upheld the of leader for publishing anti-war literature. Inthe court upheld the conviction of. While the Court upheld a conviction a third time inJustice wrote an important dissent which has gradually been absorbed as an American principle: he urged the court to treat as a fundamental right, which should rarely be restricted. In 1918, Crystal Eastman resigned from the organization due to health issues. He wanted to change its focus from litigation to direct action and public education. Baldwin was ascetic, wearing hand-me-down clothes, pinching pennies, and living on a very small salary. Magazines were routinely confiscated under the anti-obscenity ; permits for labor rallies were often denied; and virtually all anti-war or anti-government literature was outlawed. Right-wing conservatives wielded vast amounts of power, and activists that promoted unionization, socialism, or government reform were often denounced as un-American or unpatriotic. In one typical instance in 1923, author was arrested for trying to read the during an rally. One faction, including Baldwin, andbelieved that direct, militant action was the best path. Another group, including and Walter Pollak felt that lawsuits taken to the Supreme Court were the best way to achieve change. At the same time, the Communists were very aggressive in their tactics, often engaging in illegal conduct such as denying their party membership under oath. This uneasy relationship between the two groups continued for decades. The prosecution, led bycontended that the Bible should be interpreted what is the aclu and what do they do in teaching in school. The Tennessee Supreme Court later upheld the law but overturned the conviction on a technicality. Baldwin himself was involved in an important free speech victory of the 1920s, after he was arrested for attempting to speak at a rally of striking mill workers in New Jersey. Although the decision was limited to the state of New Jersey, the appeals court's judgement in 1928 declared that constitutional guarantees of free speech must be given liberal and comprehensive construction, and it marked a major turning point in thesignaling the shift of judicial opinion in favor of civil rights. See also: After the First World War, many native-born Americans had a revival of concerns about assimilation of immigrants and worries about foreign values; they wanted public schools to teach children to be American. Numerous states drafted laws designed to use schools to promote a common American culture, and in 1922, the voters of Oregon passed the. The law was primarily aimed at eliminatingincluding Catholic schools. It was promoted by groups such as thethe Federation of Patriotic Societies, the Oregon Good Government League, theand the. The required almost all children in Oregon between eight and sixteen years of age to attend by 1926. Associate Directora personal friend ofthe then—Supreme Advocate and future of theoffered to join forces with the Knights to challenge the law. The case became known asa seminal decision that significantly expanded coverage of the in the. In a unanimous decision, the court held that the act was unconstitutional and that parents, not the state, had the authority to educate children as they thought best. It upheld the religious freedom of parents to educate their children in religious schools. But, and other leaders felt that Supreme Court decisions were the best path to guarantee civil liberties. A series of Supreme Court decisions in the 1920s foretold a changing national atmosphere; anti-radical emotions what is the aclu and what do they do diminishing, and there was a growing willingness to protect freedom of speech and assembly via court decisions. State laws and city ordinances routinely outlawed speech deemed to be obscene or offensive, and prohibited meetings or literature that promoted unions or labor organization. By the early 1930s, was diminishing. The result was the first time the Supreme Court used the of the to subject states to the requirements of the. Inalso decided in 1931, the Supreme Court ruled that states may not exercise and prevent a newspaper from publishing, simply because the newspaper had a reputation for being scandalous. National leaders hailed theparticularly as it protected minorities, as the essence of democracy. The 1939 Supreme Court decision in affirmed the right of communists to promote their cause. Even conservative elements, such as the began to campaign for civil liberties, which were long considered to be the domain of left-leaning organizations. The board of directors approved Baldwin's expansion plan, except for the international efforts. But the brought new assaults on civil liberties; the year 1930 saw a what is the aclu and what do they do increase in the number of free speech prosecutions, a doubling of the number of lynchings, and all meetings of unemployed persons were banned in Philadelphia. The administration proposed the to combat the depression. In particular, movies were subject to a barrage of local ordinances banning screenings that were deemed immoral or obscene. Even public health films portraying pregnancy and birth were banned; as was magazine's April 11, 1938 issue which included photos of the birth process. The Catholic Church attained increasing political influence in the 1930s, and used its influence to promote censorship of movies, and to discourage publication of birth control information. The Supreme Court responded by making aand no longer applied strict constitutional limits to government programs, and also began to take a more active role in protecting civil liberties. The first decision that marked the court's new direction wasin which a communist labor organizer was arrested for calling a meeting to discuss unionization. The De Jonge case marked the start of an era lasting for a dozen years, during which Roosevelt appointees led by, and established a body of civil liberties law. In 1938, Justice wrote the famous footnote four in in which he suggested that state laws which impede civil liberties would — henceforth — require compelling justification. Senator proposed the in 1935, which empowered workers to unionize. In the late 1930s, some local affiliates proposed shifting their emphasis from civil liberties appellate actions, to becoming a legal aid society, centered on store front offices in low income neighborhoods. One such defendant was thewho were involved in a. The most important cases involved statutes requiring flag salutes. The Jehovah's Witnesses felt that saluting a flag was contrary to their religious beliefs. Two children were convicted in 1938 of not saluting the flag. But three years later, inthe Supreme court reversed itself and wrote If there is any fixed star in our constitutional constellation, it is that no official, high or petty, can prescribe what shall be orthodox in politics, nationalism, religion, or other matters of opinion or force citizens to confess by word or act their faith therein. To underscore its decision, the Supreme Court announced it on. Several states passed laws outlawing the hate speech directed at ethnic groups. The first person arrested under New Jersey's 1935 hate speech law was a Jehovah's Witness who was charged with disseminating anti-Catholic literature. The 1940 resolution was considered by many to be a betrayal of its fundamental principles. Chicago and New York proclaimed Civil Rights weeks, and President Franklin Delano Roosevelt announced a national Bill of Rights day. In spite of this newfound respect for civil rights, Americans were becoming adamantly anti-communist, and believed that excluding communists from American society was an essential step to preserve democracy. The most significant exception was the. In addition to the non-citizen prohibited from as members of an unassimilable raceover two-thirds of those swept up were American-born citizens. In a March 20, 1942 letter to Roosevelt, Baldwin called on the administration to allow Japanese Americans to prove their loyalty at individual hearings, describing the constitutionality of the planned removal open to grave question. His suggestions went nowhere, and opinions within the organization became increasingly divided as the Army began the evacuation of the West Coast. They decided not to challenge the eviction of Japanese American citizens, and on June 22 instructions were sent to West Coast branches not to support cases that argued the government had no constitutional right to do so. Wirin would lose private clients because of his defense of Wakayama and other Japanese Americans. However, the San Francisco branch, led byrefused to discontinue its support forwhose case had been taken on prior to the June 22 directive, and attorneywith Besig's full support, centered his defense on the illegality of Korematsu's exclusion. Of the 120,000 Japanese Americans affected by the order, only 12 disobeyed, and Korematsu, Hirabayashi, and two others were the only resisters whose cases eventually made it to the Supreme Court. Besig, dissatisfied with 's tamer defense, filed an additional amicus brief that directly addressed Hirabayashi's constitutional rights. Wirin served as one of the attorneys in decided the same day as the Hirabayashi case, and with the same resultsbut he kept his arguments within the perimeters established by the national office. Eventually Collins agreed to present the case alongsidealthough their arguments before the Supreme Court remained based in the unconstitutionality of the exclusion order Korematsu had disobeyed. The case was decided in December 1944, when the Court once again upheld the government's right to relocate Japanese Americans, although Korematsu's, Hirabayashi's and Yasui's convictions were later overturned in proceedings in the 1980s. Included in this group were the thousands of Nisei who during the war but later regretted the decision what is the aclu and what do they do tried to revoke their applications for repatriation. A significant number of those slated to go back to Japan had never actually been to the country and were in fact being deported rather than repatriated. Ernest Besig had in 1944 visited thewhere the majority of these renunciants were concentrated, and subsequently enlisted Wayne Collins' help to file a lawsuit on their behalf, arguing the renunciations had been given under duress. The national organization prohibited local branches from representing the renunciants, forcing Collins to pursue the case on his own, although Besig and the Northern California office provided some support. During his 1944 visit to Tule Lake, Besig had also became aware what is the aclu and what do they do a hastily constructed stockade in which Japanese American internees were routinely being brutalized and held for months without due process. Unable to help directly, Besig turned to Wayne Collins for assistance. Collins, using the threat of habeas corpus suits managed to have the stockade closed down. A year later, after learning that the stockade had been reestablished, he returned to the camp and had it closed down for good. American attitudes had changed since World War I, and dissent by minorities was tolerated with more willingness. The Bill of Rights was more respected, and minority rights were becoming more commonly championed. The African-American purchasers won the case in 1945. Federal investigations caused many persons with Communist or left-leaning affiliations to lose their jobs, become blacklisted, or be jailed. During the Cold War, although the United States collectively ignored the civil rights of Communists, other civil liberties—such as due process in law and separation of church and state—continued to be reinforced and even expanded. This ambivalent state of affairs would last until 1954, when the civil liberties faction prevailed, leading to the resignation of most of the anti-Communist leaders. In 1947, President Truman issuedwhich created the. This program authorized the Attorney General to create a list of organizations which were deemed to be subversive. Any association with these programs was ground for barring the person from employment. Listed organizations were not notified that they were being considered for the list, nor did they have an opportunity to present counterarguments; nor did the government divulge any factual basis for inclusion in the list. The case hinged on whether or not mere membership in a totalitarian political party was sufficient to conclude that members advocated the overthrow of the United States government. Their defense attorneys were all cited for contempt, went to prison and were disbarred. When the government indicted additional party members, the defendants could not find attorneys to represent them. The Supreme Court upheld the convictions in the decision by softening the free speech requirements from a clear and present danger test, to a grave and probable test. One reason for the Supreme Court's support of cold war legislation was the 1949 deaths of Supreme Court justices andleaving and as the only remaining civil libertarians on the Court. The Dennis decision paved the way for the prosecution of hundreds of other Communist party members. The Supreme Court, until 1957, upheld nearly every law which restricted the liberties of Communists. Baldwin objected, but a majority of the board elected to remove him from the position, and he was replaced by. Under Malin's guidance, membership tripled to 30,000 by 1955 — the start of a 24-year period of continual growth leading to 275,000 members in 1974. In response to communist witch-hunts, many witnesses and employees chose to use the protection against to avoid divulging information about their political beliefs. Government agencies and private organizations, in response, established policies which inferred communist party membership for anyone who invoked the fifth amendment. In 1953, the anti-communists, led by andproposed a set of resolutions that inferred guilt of persons that invoked the fifth amendment. Anti-communists leaders refused to accept the results of the vote, and brought the issue up for discussion again what is the aclu and what do they do the 1954 bi-annual convention. The anti-communists continued to battle Graham's proposal, but were outnumbered by the affiliates. McCarthyism declined in late 1954 after television journalist and others publicly chastised McCarthy. The controversies over the Bill of Rights that were generated by the Cold War ushered in a new era in American Civil liberties. In 1954, inthe Supreme Court unanimously overturned state-sanctioned school segregation, and thereafter a flood of civil rights victories dominated the legal landscape. Membership rose from 30,000 to 80,000, and by 1965 it had affiliates in seventeen states. That wall must be kept high and impregnable. It was not clear that the Bill of Rights forbid state governments from supporting religious education, and strong legal arguments were made by religious proponents, arguing that the Supreme Court should not act as a national school board, and that the Constitution did not govern social issues. In 1960, 42 percent of American schools included Bible reading. Religious factions across the country rebelled against the anti-prayer decisions, leading them to propose thewhich declared in-school prayer legal. The Supreme Court has never overturned such laws, although some states subsequently revoked many of the laws under pressure from commercial interests. Cities across America routinely banned movies because they were deemed to be harmful, offensive, or immoral — censorship which was validated by the 1915 Supreme Court decision which held movies to be mere commerce, undeserving of first amendment protection. As late as 1953, books such as and were still banned. But public standards rapidly became more liberal though the 1960s, and obscenity was notoriously difficult to define, so by 1971 prosecutions for obscenity had halted. The Philadelphia affiliate was responsible for causing the City of Philadelphia, in 1958, to create the nation's first civilian police review board. In 1959, the Illinois affiliate published the first report in the nation, Secret Detention by the Chicago Police, which documented unlawful detention by police. The decision in 1963 provided legal representation to indigents. And, in 1966, federal decision required police to notify suspects of their constitutional rights, which was later extended to in the following year's 1967 federal ruling. Civil liberties actions in the 1960s were often led by young people, and often employed tactics such as and marches. Protests were often peaceful, but sometimes employed militant tactics. In 1960, there were affiliates in seven states, and by 1974 there were affiliates in 46 states. After four African-American college students in a segregated North Carolina department store, the gained momentum across the United States. He was responsible for desegregating juriesdesegregating prisonsand. Another widely publicized case defended by Morgan was that of Army doctor Howard Levy, who was convicted of refusing to train. Despite raising the defense that the Green Berets were committing war crimes in Vietnam, Levy lost on appeal in Parker v. The court ruled in that a speaker cannot be arrested for disturbing the peace when the hostility is initiated by someone in the audience, as that would amount to a heckler's veto. Miller was the first person prosecuted for burning his. Miller, 1966but the Supreme Court refused to hear the appeal. Thirteen-year-old Junior High student Mary Tinker wore a black armband to school in 1965 to object to the war, and was suspended from school. This critical case established that the government may not establish enclaves such as schools or prisons where all rights are forfeit. The Supreme Court, inheld that the vulgarity of the wording was essential to convey the intensity of the message. The resolution was based in a variety of legal arguments, including civil liberties violations and a claim that the war was illegal. At the same time, the organization grew substantially. Enclaves include mental hospital patients, members of the military, and prisoners, and students while at school. The term enclave originated with Supreme Court justice 's use of the phrase schools may not be enclaves of totalitarianism in the decision. Des Moines case, and expanded it with cases such as which required schools to provide students an opportunity to appeal suspensions. Prior to 1960, prisoners had virtually no recourse to the court system, because courts considered prisoners to have no civil rights. Private attorney discovered degrading conditions in Virginia prisons following theand won an important victory in 1971's which prohibited Virginia from treating prisoners in inhumane ways. She was later appointed to the by President. The Women's Rights Project dominated the legal field, handling more than twice as many cases as theincluding breakthrough cases such as, and. The court refused to reinstate the teacher, and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed that refusal by a 2 to 1 vote. Cascade School District, 353 F. This support continues even today. Often the American Civil Liberties Union is the group to stand up for an individual when being discriminated against because of their religion, sex, gender, sexuality, race, or class, even when they are not the popular opinion. The Project promotes sexual and reproductive health by providing lessons about contraception, knowing about one's reproductive rights and assisting with the financial burdens of abortions and all of the logistics that may go into that. In some cases, Reproductive Freedom Programs fund ultrasounds and abortions and any lodging, meals, or transportation that go with that. Because women have reported finding it necessary to cross state lines or wait weeks for an abortion, The Reproductive Freedom Project states that they want to fight for individuals state by state and law by law until every individual can pursue the kind of lifestyle they want. In 1980, the Project filed Poe v. Lynchburg Training School after 8,000 women had been sterilized without their authorization. In 1985, the state decided to provide counseling and medical treatment for problems caused by what had happened 5 years prior. Pierce, the Supreme Court case that created federal regulations to prevent patients from being sterilized without their knowledge or consent. In 1981—1990, the Project litigateda case defending the rights of teenagers who chose not to comply with a state law requiring them to receive parental permission for an abortion. In the 1990s, the Project provided legal assistance and resource kits to those who were being attacked for educating about sexuality and. In 1995, the Project filed Curtis v. The Project says they are hoping to achieve these goals through legal action and litigation. These efforts culminated in one of the most controversial Supreme Court decisions of all time,which legalized abortion in the first three months of pregnancy. In 1977, a small group of American Nazis, led byapplied to the town offor permission to hold a demonstration in the town park. Skokie at the time had a majority population of Jews, totaling 40,000 of 70,000 citizens, some of whom were survivors of. Skokie refused to grant permission, and an Illinois judge supported Skokie and prohibited the demonstration. Skokie immediately passed three ordinances aimed at preventing the group from meeting in Skokie. The financial strain from the controversy led to layoffs at local chapters. The phrase subsequently was used by the organization in an advertising campaign. He also stated, It's relatively simple to click and delete. It has been criticized for this position. In November 2000, 15 African-American residents ofwere indicted on drug charges after being arrested in a series of drug sweeps. The District Attorney dismissed the charges against the plaintiffs of the suit. The 2009 film depicts this case. Lockyer, was eventually consolidated intothe case which led to same-sex what is the aclu and what do they do being available in that state from June 16, 2008, until was passed on November 4, 2008. In June 2004, the inrequired that its high school biology students listen to a statement which asserted that the theory of is not fact and mentioning as an alternative theory. After a lengthy trial, Judge ruled in favor of the parents in the decision, finding that intelligent design is not science and permanently forbidding the Dover school system from teaching intelligent design in science classes. The Court said that the anti-camping ordinance is one of the most restrictive municipal laws regulating public spaces in the United States. The compromise plan permits the homeless to sleep on the sidewalk, provided they are not within 10 feet of any business or residential entrance and only between these hours. One of the motivations for the compromise is the shortage of space in the prison system. Police Chief William Bratton said the case had slowed the police effort to fight crime and clean up Skid Row, and that when he was allowed to clean up Skid Row, real estate profited. On September 20, 2006, the Los Angeles City Council voted to reject the compromise. On October 3, 2006, police arrested Skid Row's transients for sleeping on the streets for the first time in months. Library patrons attempting to access pro-gun web sites were blocked, and the library refused to remove the blocks. The suit was filed in support of the andwho were threatened with arrest. This stance on the landmark Citizens United case caused considerable disagreement within the organization, resulting in a discussion about its future stance during a quarterly board meeting in 2010. Liberty and security do not compete in a zero-sum game; our freedoms are the very foundation of our strength and security. The Project litigates cases relating to detention, torture, discrimination, surveillance, censorship, and secrecy. It remained at that level through 2011. Under the provisions of the Patriot Act, the government had issued to Merrill to compel him to provide private Internet access information from some of his customers. In addition, the government placed a on Merrill, forbidding him from discussing the matter with anyone. On August 17, 2006, that court ruled that the warrantless wiretapping program is unconstitutional and ordered it ended immediately. However, the order was stayed pending an appeal. The administration did suspend the program while the appeal was being heard. On August 10, 2006, the lawsuits against the telecommunications companies were transferred to a federal judge in San Francisco. In January 2010, the released the names of 645 detainees held at the inmodifying its long-held position against publicizing such information. On January 27, 2017, President Trump signed an indefinitely barring Syrian refugees from entering the United States, suspended all refugee admissions for 120 days and blocked citizens of seven Muslim-majority countries, refugees or otherwise, from entering the United States for 90 days: Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen. The primary source of revenue from the segment came from individual contributions in response to the Trump presidency's infringements on. The surge in donations more than doubled the total support and revenue of the year over year from 2016 to 2017. On May 11, 2017, as Glenn Funk, the district attorney ofdecided not to prosecute police officer Joshua Lippert, they called for an independent community review board and for Nashville police officers to wear body cameras, which was approved by local voters in a referendum. American Civil Liberties Union website, section, under: Audited Financial Statements. American Civil Liberties Union web site. Officers, Section 5 President and Section 15 Executive Director. American Civil Liberties Union what is the aclu and what do they do www. Using this rounded figure, the average donation per member for 2014 comes to ,1. Membership fee is not fixed — members donate an amount of their choosing. Nickerson mentions the Puerto Rico office, and a single office for North and South Dakota, as other examples of smaller offices receiving subsidies. The case was in New Jersey, State v. University of Chicago Kent School of Law. The cases included Gitlow 1925Whitney 1927Powell 1932 and Patterson 1935. When Justice Failed: The Fred Korematsu Story, Raintree, 1992, p. Rebel Lawyer: Wayne Collins and the Defense of Japanese American Rights. Urofsky, Melvin, Church and State, in Bodenhamer, p. Board of Education, October 11, 1952. Meredith, in fact, was not assassinated. Archived from on February 1, 2017. Activists in the Liberal Establishment. National Network of Abortion Funds. Wade, but did lead the effort in the companion case. Bishop was professor of law at Yale. The federal appeal case was Smith v. See also Supreme Court: Smith v. Archived from on September 27, 2007. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. The federal appeals court case is North v. Archived from on May 17, 2010. Wilmington Morning Star 109, no. Amherst, New York: Prometheus Books. The Bill of Rights in Modern America, second edition. The Politics of the American Civil Liberties Union. Faith and Fraternalism: The History of the Knights of Columbus, 1882—1982. Roger Baldwin: Founder of the American Civil Liberties Union. A collection of essays by Baldwin, each accompanied by commentary from a modern analyst. University of Washington Special Collections. This collection illustrates that the branch was formed to address issues such as Oakland County jail conditions, lie detector use, senior housing rights, and attempts to reinstate the death penalty. Princeton University Library, Mudd Manuscript Library.

They are trying to remove all traces of of our mighty God around the world! And the group angered some in its growing body of left-wing members when it defended a white nationalist group over its right to protest in Charlottesville, Virginia — a protest that eventually erupted into violence. Anti-communists leaders refused to accept the results of the vote, and brought the issue up for discussion again at the 1954 bi-annual convention. The case went all the way to the Supreme Court. The more all these kinds of people tear down and take away God the more I know they believe in him or they wouldn't be so afraid of him.